Download a full Version of the Rules Here
1.0 Rules Overview
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
2.0 Deadlines
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
2.1 Submission of Facta
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
2.2 FAQ
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
3.0 Teams
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
2.1 Team Members
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.
2.2 Team Composition
Generated range of legal and non-legal options to meet Client’s interests, as well as interests of other side. Evaluated and selected options based on interests and, where appropriate, objective criteria. Actively encouraged the development of creative ideas. Effectively managed distributive features of dispute (effectively bridged any nal gaps). Adopted practical and realistic solutions to problems, took nancial considerations into account, incorporated new information and the ideas of others into proposals. Used a negotiating style (i.e. cooperative or competitive) that was appropriate given the interests, aspiration. Client’s interests, aspiration level and negotiating goal(s) in the process.